EasyMarkets NBP: Why True Protection Costs the Broker Money
By Joanne Cassar / 13. Aug 2026
read morePlus500 is one of the few large retail CFD brokers that publishes aggregate volume data, which makes it possible to compare what APAC retail traders actually trade against what the marketing pages assume they trade. The marketing assumption is that EURUSD dominates retail forex volume worldwide. The data says something different — and the gap between assumption and reality matters because it tells you which instruments your peer cohort is finding tradable, which is a useful (though imperfect) input to your own instrument selection. Across APAC retail accounts during 2025, the top-traded instruments at Plus500 were not EURUSD-led. Gold (XAUUSD), the US 30 (Dow Jones), crypto pairs led by BTC, and oil futures consistently outranked any individual FX pair. EURUSD appeared in the top 10 but not the top 3. GBPUSD, USDJPY, and AUDUSD appeared lower than most forex-only marketing would predict. This page walks through the volume data, explains why APAC retail differs from the global average, and tells you what the pattern means for your own instrument selection.
A 50-word answer up front: APAC retail traders on Plus500 trade gold, US indices, crypto, and oil at higher volumes than EURUSD. The pattern reflects what suits APAC time zones, account sizes, and strategy preferences. This page maps the top 10 by APAC retail volume, explains the drivers, and tells you when "popular" means "right for you."
Plus500's published trading data, combined with ChiefIdea contact-form responses from APAC traders during 2025, gives a representative picture of what APAC retail accounts actually trade. The top 10 instruments by aggregate APAC volume looked approximately like this:
The remaining ~8 percent splits across dozens of cross pairs, commodity pairs, individual stocks, and smaller indices. The takeaway is not that EURUSD is unimportant — it remains a perfectly tradable major pair. The takeaway is that APAC retail does not behave the way forex-only marketing assumes. Time zones, narrative trades, and instrument variety matter more than the marketing material acknowledges.
|
🎯 Expert Tip — Trade What Fits Your Time Zone, Not What the Course Recommended Most retail forex educational content was produced for European or American audiences and emphasises EURUSD because it fits London-overlap trading windows. APAC traders working during local business hours rarely have access to those windows — by the time London opens, APAC trading is winding down. The instruments that suit APAC sessions are different: USDJPY (Tokyo overlap), AUDUSD (Sydney session), gold (24-hour but with strong Asia liquidity), and crypto (no closing time). Pick instruments by when your screen time aligns with the instrument's most-liquid hours, not by what the curriculum recommended. |
APAC traders are awake during Sydney and Tokyo sessions. Most forex educational material assumes London or New York hours. The instruments with deep liquidity during Sydney and Tokyo — gold, USDJPY, AUDUSD, AUDNZD, and Asian indices — are the ones APAC traders can actually monitor live. EURUSD's deepest liquidity is during London-New York overlap (12:00-16:00 GMT), which corresponds to APAC late evening. A trader who must check positions before midnight is at an instrument-selection disadvantage on EURUSD.
|
⚠️ Concern — The "Popular Equals Profitable" Fallacy High aggregate volume on an instrument does not mean retail traders are profitable on that instrument. Gold has the highest APAC retail volume on Plus500 and also has one of the higher retail loss rates because the instrument's volatility punishes under-sized stops. Volume tells you what people trade, not what makes them money. Treat the rankings as a guide to which instruments fit APAC patterns, not as a recommendation to trade them. |
APAC retail traders disproportionately trade narrative themes — inflation, central bank divergence, geopolitical risk, tech earnings, crypto regime changes. Gold, crypto, and US indices are the natural vehicles for those narratives. Pure forex pairs (especially EUR crosses) require following multiple central banks across different jurisdictions, which is less accessible to retail traders working day jobs. The instrument choice reflects information accessibility, not just trading preference.
APAC retail account sizes vary widely but the median is materially smaller than European or American retail averages. Smaller accounts need larger relative price moves to produce meaningful P&L per trade. Gold, crypto, and indices typically move further in absolute terms than EURUSD over the same time window. A 100-pip EURUSD move is a typical day's range; gold can move that equivalent in two hours. Smaller-account traders gravitate toward instruments where the move-per-time is faster.
|
💡 Pro Tip — Pick Two Instruments Maximum For Your First Year The temptation to trade gold and crypto and indices and forex pairs simultaneously is the enemy of competence. Each instrument has its own character — typical daily range, news sensitivity, time-zone behaviour, technical patterns. Knowing two instruments well is mathematically superior to knowing eight instruments shallowly. For APAC traders, USDJPY plus gold is a defensible default pair — both deeply liquid during APAC hours, both reactive to the same macro narratives, both with strong technical pattern adherence. Expand to a third instrument only after twelve months of consistent results on the first two. |
Unlike MT4-focused brokers that lean toward forex by default, Plus500's proprietary platform displays indices, crypto, commodities, and stocks alongside forex with equal visual weight. The platform itself nudges retail traders toward instrument diversity. Whether that is good for retail outcomes depends on the trader — for some it expands opportunity; for many it dilutes focus.
The most-traded instrument by APAC retail (gold) is also one of the highest retail loss-rate instruments. Volume reflects accessibility and engagement, not profitability. Across audited APAC retail accounts on Plus500, gold trades produced the largest aggregate volume but a below-median win rate — the volatility that makes gold engaging also makes it punishing for under-sized stops.
Crypto pairs dominate weekend volume but produce widely varied outcomes. Saturday-Sunday CFD crypto trading is heavily APAC-led because forex markets are closed and crypto fills the void. The volatility is high, the spreads are wide compared to forex pairs, and outcomes vary widely with the trader's experience.
EURUSD remains the lowest-volatility, lowest-spread major pair available — and that is exactly why retail traders find it boring. The "best" pair for risk-adjusted returns is often the one with the least exciting price action. The pairs that feel exciting (gold, crypto, indices) carry the volatility that produces both opportunity and risk.
|
⏰ Insider Note — Track Your Own Volume Pareto Most retail traders have what statisticians call a Pareto distribution in their own trading data: roughly 80 percent of their P&L comes from 20 percent of their trades, and roughly 80 percent of their trades come from 20 percent of their watched instruments. Spend an hour each quarter pulling your own trade history and ranking your P&L by instrument. The instrument that generates most of your profit is your real specialty. Drop the ones that generate most of your losses. You will end with two or three instruments you actually trade well — which is the optimal number. |
Does Plus500 publish actual trading volume data? Plus500 publishes some aggregate engagement data in its public filings as a listed company. The figures in this page combine that public data with ChiefIdea contact-form responses; they are representative, not precise.
Is Plus500 forex or CFD? Plus500 offers CFDs across forex, indices, commodities, stocks, and crypto. There is no separate "forex account" — all instruments are accessed through the same CFD trading interface.
Should I trade what is popular on Plus500? Not necessarily. Popular instruments are the ones APAC retail traders engage with; they are not always the ones APAC retail traders profit from. Treat the volume data as a guide to instrument fit, not as a buy signal.
Does the spread on Plus500 differ by instrument? Yes, significantly. EURUSD typically has the tightest spreads; crypto and exotic pairs have the widest.
|
🔥 Watch-Out — Five Instrument-Selection Mistakes That Compound Losses ✗ Trading EURUSD because the course said to, when you cannot monitor London hours. ✗ Trading gold without sizing your stops for its higher volatility — the most common APAC retail mistake. ✗ Weekend crypto trading at full size without recognising the spread cost. ✗ Trading more than three instruments simultaneously in your first year. ✗ Confusing high volume with high profitability — they are different metrics. Picking instruments by time-zone fit and your own historical P&L Pareto beats picking by what is popular. |
What APAC retail traders actually trade differs from what the global forex-marketing assumes. Gold, US indices, crypto, and oil consistently outrank EURUSD by aggregate volume. The pattern reflects time zones, narrative trades, account sizes, and platform design — not random preference. Use the volume data as input to your instrument selection, but check your own historical P&L Pareto before committing capital. The instrument that other people trade most is not necessarily the instrument that will treat you best.